Passage
And the waters returned, and covered the chariots and the horsemen of all the army of Pharao, who had come into the sea after them, neither did there so much as one of them remain.
And the waters returned, and covered the chariots and the horsemen of all the army of Pharao, who had come into the sea after them, neither did there so much as one of them remain.
Exodus 14:26 And the Lord said to Moses: Stretch forth thy hand over the sea, that the waters may come again upon the Egyptians, upon their chariots and horsemen.
Exodus 14:27 And when Moses had stretched forth his hand towards the sea, it returned at the first break of day to the former place: and as the Egyptians were fleeing away, the waters came upon them, and the Lord shut them up in the middle of the waves.
Exodus 14:28 And the waters returned, and covered the chariots and the horsemen of all the army of Pharao, who had come into the sea after them, neither did there so much as one of them remain.
Exodus 14:29 But the children of Israel marched through the midst of the sea upon dry land, and the waters were to them as a wall on the right hand and on the left:
Exodus 14:30 And the Lord delivered Israel in that day out of the hands of the Egyptians.
The verse centers on "waters", "returned", "covered", "chariots", "horsemen", "army", "pharao", and "come". It is saying that the verse draws attention to "waters" and "returned", so its meaning should be read from those terms before moving to application.
The nearby context moves from verse 27's "And when Moses had stretched forth his..." into verse 29's "But the children of Israel marched through...", so "waters" and "returned" belong inside that flow. In Exodus context, the local focus is covenant, worship, and faithfulness.
A plain takeaway is to answer the verse's own emphasis on "waters" and "returned" with trust shaped by these words, not by a vague optimism outside the passage.