Passage
Both were iust before God, and walked in all the commandements and ordinances of the Lord, without reproofe.
Both were iust before God, and walked in all the commandements and ordinances of the Lord, without reproofe.
Luke 1:4 That thou mightest acknowledge the certaintie of those things, whereof thou hast bene instructed.
Luke 1:5 In the time of Herod King of Iudea, there was a certaine Priest named Zacharias, of the course of Abia: and his wife was of the daughters of Aaron, and her name was Elisabet.
Luke 1:6 Both were iust before God, and walked in all the commandements and ordinances of the Lord, without reproofe.
Luke 1:7 And they had no childe, because that Elisabet was barren: and both were well stricken in age.
Luke 1:8 And it came to passe, as he executed the Priestes office before God, as his course came in order,
The verse centers on "both", "iust", "before", "walked", "commandements", "ordinances", "lord", and "without". It is saying that the verse draws attention to "both" and "iust", so its meaning should be read from those terms before moving to application.
The nearby context moves from verse 5's "In the time of Herod King of..." into verse 7's "And they had no childe because that...", so "both" and "iust" belong inside that flow. In Luke context, the local focus is Christ, faith, and discipleship.
A plain takeaway is to answer the verse's own emphasis on "both" and "iust" with trust shaped by these words, not by a vague optimism outside the passage.