Passage
Now he didn’t say this of himself, but being high priest that year, he prophesied that Jesus would die for the nation,
Now he didn’t say this of himself, but being high priest that year, he prophesied that Jesus would die for the nation,
John 11:49 But a certain one of them, Caiaphas, being high priest that year, said to them, “You know nothing at all,
John 11:50 nor do you consider that it is advantageous for us that one man should die for the people, and that the whole nation not perish.”
John 11:51 Now he didn’t say this of himself, but being high priest that year, he prophesied that Jesus would die for the nation,
John 11:52 and not for the nation only, but that he might also gather together into one the children of God who are scattered abroad.
John 11:53 So from that day forward they took counsel that they might put him to death.
The verse centers on "didn", "himself", "high", "priest", "year", "prophesied", "jesus", and "nation". It is saying that the verse draws attention to "didn" and "himself", so its meaning should be read from those terms before moving to application.
The nearby context moves from verse 50's "nor do you consider that it is..." into verse 52's "and not for the nation only but...", so "didn" and "himself" belong inside that flow. In John context, the local focus is the identity of Jesus, new birth, eternal life, and belief and unbelief.
A plain takeaway is to answer the verse's own emphasis on "didn" and "himself" with trust shaped by these words, not by a vague optimism outside the passage.